![]() Therefore, R15 and R20 results cannot be compared. The test also requires about 4x the memory. Cinebench R20 uses a much larger and more complex test scene than R15, requiring about 8x the computational power needed to render it.For those who have to do a serious amount of testing Cinebench also provides a command line option, allowing users to run automated test procedures. Unlike abstract benchmarks, which only test specific functions of CPUs or GPUs, Cinebench offers a real-world benchmark that incorporates a user's common tasks within CINEMA 4D to measure a system's performance. ![]() Any computer owner can evaluate his or her individual system. The higher the number, the faster your graphics card is.Īnyone who needs to evaluate hardware performance should add Maxon Cinebench to the test tool arsenal.System administrators can use Cinebench to help make purchase decisions, journalists can use the results in reviewing hardware, hardware manufacturers may utilize the feedback in optimizing their latest products. The result is measured in frames per second (fps). The graphics card has to display a huge amount of geometry (nearly 1 million polygons) and textures, as well as a variety of effects, such as environments, bump maps, transparency, lighting and more to evaluate the performance across different disciplines and give a good average overview of the capabilities of your graphics hardware. The performance depends on various factors, such as the GPU processor on your hardware, on the drivers used. This procedure uses a complex 3D scene depicting a car chase (created by renderbaron) which measures the performance of your graphics card in OpenGL mode. The higher the number, the faster your processor. This test scene contains approximately 2,000 objects which in turn contain more than 300,000 polygons in total, and uses sharp and blurred reflections, area lights, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and much more. In fact, Cinebench can measure systems with up to 256 processor threads. This scene makes use of various algorithms to stress all available processor cores. The test scenario uses all of your system's processing power to render a photorealistic 3D scene (from the viral "No Keyframes" animation by AixSponza). Improvements to Cinebench reflect the overall advancements to CPU and rendering technology in recent years, providing a more accurate measurement of Cinema 4D's ability to take advantage of multiple CPU cores and modern processor features available to the average user. Cinebench scores are used by system administrators to help make purchase decisions, journalists to review hardware, hardware manufacturers to optimize their latest products, as well as computer owners to evaluate their individual system. We also keep hosting the older Cinebench R15 for the same reason.įor over a decade, Cinebench has been a popular tool to evaluate hardware performance. Cinebench Release 20 provides a more accurate measurement of Cinema 4D's ability to take advantage of multiple CPU cores and modern processor features available to the average user.Ĭinebench R23 is the most recent release of the benchmark – see how we use it to test the latest CPUs – but Cinebench R20 is still widely used for testing. The Redditor tested on Windows 10, so we used our Windows 10 results for comparison.Cinebench is a real-world cross-platform test suite that evaluates your computer's hardware capabilities. On the other hand, our DDR4 platform utilized DDR4-3200 with 14-14-14-36 timings. So, the Redditor had the upper hand since their system had faster memory. However, the user used DDR5-6200 at 32-38-38-76, whereas our DDR5 platform revolved around DDR5-4400 with timings set at 36-36-36-72. The E-cores, on the other hand, maxed out at 4 GHz.Ĭinebench R23 is part of our CPU test suite, allowing us to compare our existing data for other processors to the Redditor's Core i9-12900KS results. The Redditor confirmed the Core i9-12900K's behavior in the Cinebench R23 runs, where the 16-core chip had two of its P-cores boosted to 5.5 GHz and the rest to 5.2 GHz. In a nutshell, consumers are receiving a 200 MHz higher base and boost clock over the Core i9-12900K. However, the Alder Lake processor's most considerable appeal comes in the shape of its higher clock speeds. The Core i9-12900KS will offer the same cores as the regular Core i9-12900K.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |